Liberty, Sweet Liberty!

How much liberty is perfect liberty, as we all know liberties can be denied by tyrants and despots in violation of their peoples' human rights? Is all that's allowed by the king because he's a good man enough? Are the elected bodies granted liberties enough to be the perfect liberty for people to possess to be free? What if all these agreed nothing was allowed but to do as you are told by the elected officials by their majority approval? When in Rome do as the Romans seems to be the basic community standards of what's allowed!
In my view, all the harmless liberty allowable is either given right to indulge in or the body preventing said is in violation of the party or parties being denied their liberties to...
What do I know though seems to be the response I get from anyone I've ever written to about the suppression of our liberties done by the laws vice codes and the war on drugs! Being a diagnosed schizophrenic, I sometimes wonder is it me or them that has a hole in their heads they lost a couple of their marbles out of their minds?
I looked for a law firm to take a class action case pro bono, even wrote the ACLU about it but there was no one who felt up to the job. I cannot blame them with some elected officials religiously opposed to certain liberties. They are alright about pork sausages for breakfast but no selling this and that nor any of those services and definitely no gaming in our town...(Pork is forbidden in God's law of the Old Testament.)
I even emailed a few Presidents asking them to repeal these laws, and to free those arrested on vice laws and the drug prohibition legislation, and clear their record with a Presidential pardon, but no one responded, so I stopped asking each newly elected President.
Now I am taking it to you. Do you think it is a crazy idea to allow anything safe to do to be done? Is it ridiculous thought that perfect liberty in the Bible New Testament Book of James is allowing it all, every harmless deed?
Of course, this radical liberty is not for everyone. Some would rather do in Rome as the Romans do than risk being different or getting in trouble for taking liberties Romans do not care for. Is that why no one wanted to take the case to court?